[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1432641006-8025-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 13:50:03 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC 0/3] get rid of mm_struct::owner
Hi,
this small series drops IMO awkward mm_struct::owner field which is
used to track task which owns the mm_struct and which is then used for
mm->mem_cgroup mapping. The motivation for the change and drawback
(namely user visible change of behavior) is described in the patch 3.
The first patch is a trivial cleanup by Tejun
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=143197860820270) and I have added it
here just to prevent from conflicts with his changes.
Patch 2 is preparatory and it shouldn't cause any functional changes.
It simply replaces mc.to as an indicator of the charge migration
during task move by using mc.moving_task because we need to have mc.to
available even when the charges are not migrated.
I am sending this as an RFC because of the user visible aspect of the
change. I am not convinced that there is a strong usecase to justify
keeping mm->owner but I would like to hear back first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists