[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150526143547.GA22363@cbox>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:35:47 +0200
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To: Steve Capper <steve.capper@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
ebru.akagunduz@...il.com,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
vbabka@...e.cz, Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Read-Only THP causes stalls (commit 10359213d)
Hi Steve,
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:24:20PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
> >> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 09:34:04PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I noticed a regression on my arm64 APM X-Gene system a couple
> >> > of weeks back. I would occassionally see the system lock up and see RCU
> >> > stalls during the caching phase of kernbench. I then wrote a small
> >> > script that does nothing but cache the files
> >> > (http://paste.ubuntu.com/11324767/) and ran that in a loop. On a known
> >> > bad commit (v4.1-rc2), out of 25 boots, I never saw it get past 21
> >> > iterations of the loop. I have since tried to run a bisect from v3.19 to
> >> > v4.0 using 100 iterations as my criteria for a good commit.
> >> >
> >> > This resulted in the following first bad commit:
> >> >
> >> > 10359213d05acf804558bda7cc9b8422a828d1cd
> >> > (mm: incorporate read-only pages into transparent huge pages, 2015-02-11)
> >> >
> >> > Indeed, running the workload on v4.1-rc4 still produced the behavior,
> >> > but reverting the above commit gets me through 100 iterations of the
> >> > loop.
> >> >
> >> > I have not tried to reproduce on an x86 system. Turning on a bunch
> >> > of kernel debugging features *seems* to hide the problem. My config for
> >> > the XGene system is defconfig + CONFIG_BRIDGE and
> >> > CONFIG_POWER_RESET_XGENE.
> >> >
> >> > Please let me know if I can help test patches or other things I can
> >> > do to help. I'm afraid that by simply reading the patch I didn't see
> >> > anything obviously wrong with it which would cause this behavior.
> >>
> >> As further confirmation, could you try:
> >>
> >> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_to_scan
> >
> > this returns -EINVAL.
> >
> > But I'm trying now with:
> >
> > echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
> >
> >>
> >> and verify the problem goes away without having to revert the patch?
> >
> > will let you know, so far so good...
> >
> >>
> >> Accordingly you should reproduce much eaiser this way (setting
> >> $largevalue to 8192 or something, it doesn't matter).
> >>
> >> echo $largevalue > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/pages_to_scan
> >> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/alloc_sleep_millisecs
> >> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/khugepaged/scan_sleep_millisecs
> >>
> >> Then push the system into swap with some memhog -r1000 xG.
> >
> > what is memhog? I couldn't find the utility in Google...
> >
> > I did try with the above settings and just push a bunch of data into
> > ramfs and tmpfs and indeed the sytem died very quickly (on v4.0-rc4).
> >
> >>
> >> The patch just allows readonly anon pages to be collapsed along with
> >> read-write ones, the vma permissions allows it, so they have to be
> >> swapcache pages, this is why swap shall be required.
> >>
> >> Perhaps there's some arch detail that needs fixing but it'll be easier
> >> to track it down once you have a way to reproduce fast.
> >>
> > Yes, would be great to be able to reproduce quickly.
> >
> I'm trying to reproduce this on hardware here; but have been unable to
> thus far with 4.1-rc2 on a Xgene and Seattle systems.
Really? That's concerning. I think Andre mentioned he could
reproduce...
How many iterations have you run the caching loop for?
Are you using defconfig? I noticed that turning on debugging features
was hiding the problem.
> Also, I tried the memhog + pages_to_scan suggestion from Andrea.
Any chance you could send me the memhog tool?
>
> Maybe a silly question, where is your root filesystem located? Is
> there anything network mounted?
>
It's a regular ext4 on the local SATA disk. Ubuntu Trusty.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists