linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong DEBUG configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150526152200.GI17970@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2015 12:22:00 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong DEBUG configuration

Em Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:36:26AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:13:32AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > As Arnaldo pointed, I split the patch to following 2 smaller patches.
> 
> Thanks, but how did you generated the two attached patches? 
> 
>  [acme@...andy linux]$ git am /wb/0001-perf-Fix-compiler-warnings.patch 
>   Patch format detection failed.
> 
> So I'll fix it up manually, next time please try:
> 
>   git format-patch -n HEAD^^..
> 
> Or equivalent,

I am also splitting the second patch into two, as it does two unrelated
things:

1. Conditionally use -Og instead of -O0 

2. Use -O3 instead of -O6, as -O6 is the same as -O3 currently

And I am not applying the second, as it doesn't fixes anything nor
improves the current situation, right?

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/