[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150526155320.GK17970@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:53:20 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong DEBUG configuration
Em Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:48:27PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> On 05/26/2015 04:36 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:13:32AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> >>>* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>>Em Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:12:44PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> >>As Arnaldo pointed, I split the patch to following 2 smaller patches.
> >Thanks, but how did you generated the two attached patches?
> > [acme@...andy linux]$ git am /wb/0001-perf-Fix-compiler-warnings.patch
> > Patch format detection failed.
> >So I'll fix it up manually, next time please try:
> > git format-patch -n HEAD^^..
> >Or equivalent,
> That's quite strange, I've just rebuilt my branch to perf/perf/core and
> I was given equal patches for:
> 'git format-patch -2'
> Maybe that's related to erased patch header(From, Date, Subject).
Yes, I had to add at least From: and Subject:, but my scripts will pick
as well the Message-ID to create the Link: line, Cc: info to add the CC
and some other stuff that are present when fed with one message per
patch.
> Thanks for re-application,
You're welcome, keep on contributing!
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists