lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1432654896-28478-53-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2015 08:40:56 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 52/92] gpio: sysfs: fix memory leaks and device hotplug

3.19.8-ckt1 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

commit 483d821108791092798f5d230686868112927044 upstream.

Unregister GPIOs requested through sysfs at chip remove to avoid leaking
the associated memory and sysfs entries.

The stale sysfs entries prevented the gpio numbers from being exported
when the gpio range was later reused (e.g. at device reconnect).

This also fixes the related module-reference leak.

Note that kernfs makes sure that any on-going sysfs operations finish
before the class devices are unregistered and that further accesses
fail.

The chip exported flag is used to prevent gpiod exports during removal.
This also makes it harder to trigger, but does not fix, the related race
between gpiochip_remove and export_store, which is really a race with
gpiod_request that needs to be addressed separately.

Also note that this would prevent the crashes (e.g. NULL-dereferences)
at reconnect that affects pre-3.18 kernels, as well as use-after-free on
operations on open attribute files on pre-3.14 kernels (prior to
kernfs).

Fixes: d8f388d8dc8d ("gpio: sysfs interface")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
index 7722ed5..af3bc7a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-sysfs.c
@@ -551,6 +551,7 @@ static struct class gpio_class = {
  */
 int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 {
+	struct gpio_chip	*chip;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	int			status;
 	const char		*ioname = NULL;
@@ -568,8 +569,16 @@ int gpiod_export(struct gpio_desc *desc, bool direction_may_change)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	chip = desc->chip;
+
 	mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
 
+	/* check if chip is being removed */
+	if (!chip || !chip->exported) {
+		status = -ENODEV;
+		goto fail_unlock;
+	}
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
 	if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) ||
 	     test_bit(FLAG_EXPORT, &desc->flags)) {
@@ -783,12 +792,15 @@ void gpiochip_unexport(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 {
 	int			status;
 	struct device		*dev;
+	struct gpio_desc *desc;
+	unsigned int i;
 
 	mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
 	dev = class_find_device(&gpio_class, NULL, chip, match_export);
 	if (dev) {
 		put_device(dev);
 		device_unregister(dev);
+		/* prevent further gpiod exports */
 		chip->exported = false;
 		status = 0;
 	} else
@@ -797,6 +809,13 @@ void gpiochip_unexport(struct gpio_chip *chip)
 
 	if (status)
 		chip_dbg(chip, "%s: status %d\n", __func__, status);
+
+	/* unregister gpiod class devices owned by sysfs */
+	for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
+		desc = &chip->desc[i];
+		if (test_and_clear_bit(FLAG_SYSFS, &desc->flags))
+			gpiod_free(desc);
+	}
 }
 
 static int __init gpiolib_sysfs_init(void)
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ