[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55649F9F.9090401@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:30:23 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/hugetlb: compute/return the number of regions
added by region_add()
On 05/24/2015 11:19 PM, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:55:03PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> Modify region_add() to keep track of regions(pages) added to the
>> reserve map and return this value. The return value can be
>> compared to the return value of region_chg() to determine if the
>> map was modified between calls.
>>
>> Add documentation to the reserve/region map routines.
>>
>> Make vma_commit_reservation() also pass along the return value of
>> region_add(). In the normal case, we want vma_commit_reservation
>> to return the same value as the preceding call to vma_needs_reservation.
>> Create a common __vma_reservation_common routine to help keep the
>> special case return values in sync
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> mm/hugetlb.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 54f129d..3855889 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -212,8 +212,16 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *subpool_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> * Region tracking -- allows tracking of reservations and instantiated pages
>> * across the pages in a mapping.
>> *
>> - * The region data structures are embedded into a resv_map and
>> - * protected by a resv_map's lock
>> + * The region data structures are embedded into a resv_map and protected
>> + * by a resv_map's lock. The set of regions within the resv_map represent
>> + * reservations for huge pages, or huge pages that have already been
>> + * instantiated within the map.
>
>> The from and to elements are huge page
>> + * indicies into the associated mapping. from indicates the starting index
>> + * of the region. to represents the first index past the end of the region.
>> + * For example, a file region structure with from == 0 and to == 4 represents
>> + * four huge pages in a mapping. It is important to note that the to element
>> + * represents the first element past the end of the region. This is used in
>> + * arithmetic as 4(to) - 0(from) = 4 huge pages in the region.
>
> How about just saying "[from, to)", which implies "from" is inclusive and "to"
> is exclusive. I hope this mathematical notation is widely accepted among kernel
> developers.
OK, I'll add the mathematical notation. But, I think the more explicit
description and example might help those who would not recognize the
notation.
>> */
>> struct file_region {
>> struct list_head link;
>> @@ -221,10 +229,23 @@ struct file_region {
>> long to;
>> };
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Add the huge page range represented by indicies f (from)
>> + * and t (to) to the reserve map. Existing regions will be
>> + * expanded to accommodate the specified range. We know only
>> + * existing regions need to be expanded, because region_add
>> + * is only called after region_chg(with the same range). If
>> + * a new file_region structure must be allocated, it is done
>> + * in region_chg.
>> + *
>> + * Return the number of new huge pages added to the map. This
>> + * number is greater than or equal to zero.
>> + */
>> static long region_add(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
>> {
>> struct list_head *head = &resv->regions;
>> struct file_region *rg, *nrg, *trg;
>> + long add = 0;
>>
>> spin_lock(&resv->lock);
>> /* Locate the region we are either in or before. */
>> @@ -250,16 +271,44 @@ static long region_add(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
>> if (rg->to > t)
>> t = rg->to;
>> if (rg != nrg) {
>> + /* Decrement return value by the deleted range.
>> + * Another range will span this area so that by
>> + * end of routine add will be >= zero
>> + */
>> + add -= (rg->to - rg->from);
>
> I can't say how, but if file_region data were broken for some reason (mainly
> due to bug,) this could return negative value, so how about asserting add >=0
> with VM_BUG_ON() at the end of this function?
>
Sure, that should not be a problem.
>> list_del(&rg->link);
>> kfree(rg);
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + add += (nrg->from - f); /* Added to beginning of region */
>> nrg->from = f;
>> + add += t - nrg->to; /* Added to end of region */
>> nrg->to = t;
>> +
>> spin_unlock(&resv->lock);
>> - return 0;
>> + return add;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Examine the existing reserve map and determine how many
>> + * huge pages in the specified range (f, t) are NOT currently
>
> "[f, t)" would be better.
>
Yes, my plan is to use the mathematical notation throughout with a
more detailed explanation the first time it is used.
>> + * represented. This routine is called before a subsequent
>> + * call to region_add that will actually modify the reserve
>> + * map to add the specified range (f, t). region_chg does
>> + * not change the number of huge pages represented by the
>> + * map. However, if the existing regions in the map can not
>> + * be expanded to represent the new range, a new file_region
>> + * structure is added to the map as a placeholder. This is
>> + * so that the subsequent region_add call will have all
>> + * regions it needs and will not fail.
>> + *
>> + * Returns the number of huge pages that need to be added
>> + * to the existing reservation map for the range (f, t).
>> + * This number is greater or equal to zero. -ENOMEM is
>> + * returned if a new file_region structure can not be
>> + * allocated.
>> + */
>> static long region_chg(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
>> {
>> struct list_head *head = &resv->regions;
>> @@ -326,6 +375,11 @@ out_nrg:
>> return chg;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Truncate the reserve map at index 'end'. Modify/truncate any
>> + * region which contains end. Delete any regions past end.
>> + * Return the number of huge pages removed from the map.
>> + */
>> static long region_truncate(struct resv_map *resv, long end)
>> {
>> struct list_head *head = &resv->regions;
>> @@ -361,6 +415,10 @@ out:
>> return chg;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Count and return the number of huge pages in the reserve map
>> + * that intersect with the range (f, t).
>> + */
>> static long region_count(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
>> {
>> struct list_head *head = &resv->regions;
>> @@ -1424,46 +1482,56 @@ static void return_unused_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h,
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * Determine if the huge page at addr within the vma has an associated
>> - * reservation. Where it does not we will need to logically increase
>> - * reservation and actually increase subpool usage before an allocation
>> - * can occur. Where any new reservation would be required the
>> - * reservation change is prepared, but not committed. Once the page
>> - * has been allocated from the subpool and instantiated the change should
>> - * be committed via vma_commit_reservation. No action is required on
>> - * failure.
>> + * vma_needs_reservation and vma_commit_reservation are used by the huge
>> + * page allocation routines to manage reservations.
>> + *
>> + * vma_needs_reservation is called to determine if the huge page at addr
>> + * within the vma has an associated reservation. If a reservation is
>> + * needed, the value 1 is returned. The caller is then responsible for
>> + * managing the global reservation and subpool usage counts. After
>> + * the huge page has been allocated, vma_commit_reservation is called
>> + * to add the page to the reservation map.
>> + *
>> + * In the normal case, vma_commit_reservation should return the same value
>> + * as the preceding vma_needs_reservation call. The only time this is
>> + * not the case is if a reserve map was changed between calls. It is the
>> + * responsibility of the caller to notice the difference and take appropriate
>> + * action.
>> */
>> -static long vma_needs_reservation(struct hstate *h,
>> - struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>> +static long __vma_reservation_common(struct hstate *h,
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>> + bool needs)
>> {
>> struct resv_map *resv;
>> pgoff_t idx;
>> - long chg;
>> + long ret;
>>
>> resv = vma_resv_map(vma);
>> if (!resv)
>> return 1;
>>
>> idx = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, addr);
>> - chg = region_chg(resv, idx, idx + 1);
>> + if (needs)
>> + ret = region_chg(resv, idx, idx + 1);
>> + else
>> + ret = region_add(resv, idx, idx + 1);
>
> This code sharing is OK, but the name "needs" looks a bit unclear to me.
> I feel that it's more readable if we name "commit" (or "commits") to the bool
> parameter and call region_add() if "commit" is true.
>
Agree. And Davidlor suggested renaming "needs" in the routine name
to prepare. If renamed prepare, I think it would more clear.
>>
>> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
>> - return chg;
>> + return ret;
>> else
>> - return chg < 0 ? chg : 0;
>> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
>> }
>> -static void vma_commit_reservation(struct hstate *h,
>> +
>> +static long vma_needs_reservation(struct hstate *h,
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>> {
>> - struct resv_map *resv;
>> - pgoff_t idx;
>> -
>> - resv = vma_resv_map(vma);
>> - if (!resv)
>> - return;
>> + return __vma_reservation_common(h, vma, addr, (bool)1);
>
> You can simply use literal "true"?
Yes.
Thank you for the review and comments.
--
Mike Kravetz
>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
>
>> +}
>>
>> - idx = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, addr);
>> - region_add(resv, idx, idx + 1);
>> +static long vma_commit_reservation(struct hstate *h,
>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
>> +{
>> + return __vma_reservation_common(h, vma, addr, (bool)0);
>> }
>>
>> static struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> --
>> 2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists