[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5563F5C8.2040806@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 00:25:44 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <daniel@...nq.net>, David Lang <david@...g.hm>
CC: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
tux3@...3.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes
On 05/21/2015 03:53 PM, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 20, 2015 8:51:46 PM PDT, David Lang wrote:
>> how do you prevent it from continuing to interact with the old version
>> of the page and never see updates or have it's changes reflected on
>> the current page?
>
> Why would it do that, and what would be surprising about it? Did
> you have a specific case in mind?
After a get_page(), page_cache_get(), or other equivalent
function, a piece of code has the expectation that it can
continue using that page until after it has released the
reference count.
This can be an arbitrarily long period of time.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists