[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150526182403.GA23370@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:24:03 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, fu.wei@...aro.org,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
tekkamanninja@...il.com, graeme.gregory@...aro.org,
al.stone@...aro.org, ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
vgandhi@...eaurora.org, wim@...ana.be, jcm@...hat.com,
leo.duran@....com, corbet@....net, mark.rutland@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] ACPI: import watchdog info of GTDT into platform
device
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:35:19AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 05/26/2015 03:28 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>
> >> early_acpi_os_unmap_memory((char *)table, tbl_size);
> >> }
> >
> >please add
> >
> >#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SBSA_WATCHDOG
> >(acpi gtdt code)
> >#endif
>
> I don't agree with this. The GTDT should be parsed even if there's no
> watchdog driver compiled for this kernel. There are no other #ifdefs in
> this file.
>
Me not either, but then I thought this is really a maintainer question.
If the maintainers want out-of-subsystem #ifdefs in the code, who am I
to complain.
Should be "#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SBSA_WATCHDOG)", though, if we go
along that route.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists