[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150526183734.GA31081@xsjsorenbubuntu>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:37:34 -0700
From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: zynq: change error code for pinctrl_register
failure
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:12AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 13:18:29 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
> > index 04748a4..0ff653c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-zynq.c
> > @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int zynq_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > pctrl->pctrl = pinctrl_register(&zynq_desc, &pdev->dev, pctrl);
> > if (!pctrl->pctrl)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctrl);
> >
> >
>
> One choice seems as bad as the other to me ;-)
>
> Could we add a pinctrl_register_reason() variant that returns a meaningful
> error code as ERR_PTR?
I agree with Arnd. As long as we don't get a precise error code we can
just keep the current one.
Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists