[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432669355.7862.16.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 14:42:35 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC: 'Christophe Leroy' <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc: add support for csum_add()
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 13:57 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Scott Wood ...
> > > I'd also have thought that the 64bit C version above would be
> > > generally 'good'.
> >
> > It doesn't generate the addc/addze sequence. At least with GCC
> > 4.8.2,
> > it does something like:
> >
> > mr tmp0, csum
> > li tmp1, 0
> > li tmp2, 0
> > addc tmp3, addend, tmp0
> > adde csum, tmp2, tmp1
> > add csum, csum, tmp3
>
> I was thinking of all 64bit targets, not 32bit ones.
Oh, you mean move it out of arch/powerpc? Sounds reasonable, but
someone should probably check what the resulting code looks like on
other common arches. OTOH, if we're going to modify non-arch code,
that might be a good opportunity to implement Segher's suggestion and
move to a 64-bit accumulator.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists