[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLUdHGLVxic89CVtX-NcG3kX1LXyDzgDjsyLMfjnQk5SAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 16:09:36 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Frank Hirtz <fhirtz@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Leap Second, nohz, and ABSOLUTE timers problem
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 7:55 AM, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> We've identified an issue with ABSOLUTE timers and the leap second that
> effects, AFAICT, all kernels.
>
> This is the scenario. Suppose you have a userspace program that has an
> ABSOLUTE timer that will expire @ midnight (00:00:00) UTC. The timer expiry
> should occur at the end of the leap second event but it does not always occur
> at the end. In fact it may occur during the leap second event and effectively
> one second too early.
>
> In the NOHZ kernel, timers are not necessarily aligned to the ticks the
> following does happen in userspace:
Hrm.. Thanks for the report! Looks like this could happen on !NOHZ as
well, and is an artifact of the fact the leapsecond is being applied
by a timer.
I'm working on a patch and will send it out shortly.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists