| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55655637.30505@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 14:29:27 +0900
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, mark.rutland@....com
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, geoff@...radead.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, david.griego@...aro.org,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, freddy77@...il.com
Subject: Re: [v4 2/4] arm64: kvm: add kvm cpu hotplug
On 05/26/2015 06:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 08/05/15 02:18, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>> This patch allows cpu cores to be up and down by adding
>> kvm_arch_hardware_enable/isable(). This way, especially in kexec case,
>> cores are reset to initial states and kexec can gracefully shutdown the
>> system and reboot a new kernel from EL2.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
>> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
>> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 41008cd..ca97764 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ void kvm_mmu_wp_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot);
>>
>> struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>>
>> -static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void) {}
>> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
>> static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>> index 251ab9e..e989925 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -87,11 +87,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu * __percpu *kvm_get_running_vcpus(void)
>> return &kvm_arm_running_vcpu;
>> }
>>
>> -int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void)
>> -{
>> - return 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> int kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> return kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode(vcpu) == IN_GUEST_MODE;
>> @@ -885,6 +880,9 @@ static void cpu_init_hyp_mode(void *dummy)
>
> Since you removed the IPI, why do you keep the dummy argument?
Yeah, will remove it.
>> unsigned long stack_page;
>> unsigned long vector_ptr;
>>
>> + if (__hyp_get_vectors() != hyp_default_vectors)
>> + return;
>> +
>> /* Switch from the HYP stub to our own HYP init vector */
>> __hyp_set_vectors(kvm_get_idmap_vector());
>>
>> @@ -921,6 +919,10 @@ static int hyp_init_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>> if (__hyp_get_vectors() == hyp_default_vectors)
>> cpu_init_hyp_mode(NULL);
>> break;
>> + case CPU_DYING:
>> + case CPU_DYING_FROZEN:
>> + kvm_cpu_reset(NULL);
>> + break;
>> }
>>
>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>> @@ -936,6 +938,7 @@ static int hyp_init_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
>> void *v)
>> {
>> if (cmd == CPU_PM_EXIT &&
>> + kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu() &&
>> __hyp_get_vectors() == hyp_default_vectors) {
>> cpu_init_hyp_mode(NULL);
>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>> @@ -1039,11 +1042,6 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * Execute the init code on each CPU.
>> - */
>> - on_each_cpu(cpu_init_hyp_mode, NULL, 1);
>> -
>> - /*
>> * Init HYP view of VGIC
>> */
>> err = kvm_vgic_hyp_init();
>> @@ -1144,6 +1142,17 @@ out_err:
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +int kvm_arch_hardware_enable(void)
>> +{
>> + cpu_init_hyp_mode(NULL);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void)
>> +{
>> + kvm_cpu_reset(NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Bahhh... Just rename cpu_init_hyp_mode to kvm_arch_hardware_enable, and
> kvM_cpu_reset to kvm_arch_hardware_disable. I don't see the point of
> keeping this indirection.
Historical reason ...
Anyway, if we don't have to add anything else here, yes, I will rename them.
-Takahiro AKASHI
>> /* NOP: Compiling as a module not supported */
>> void kvm_arch_exit(void)
>> {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 6a8da9c..831e6a4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -262,7 +262,6 @@ static inline void vgic_arch_setup(const struct vgic_params *vgic)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_disable(void) {}
>> static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
>> static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
>> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists