[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150527081549.GA25575@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:15:49 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev()
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:03:09AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> But I don't think the sequence is right.
>
> You cannot remove ->merge_bvec_fn for *any* stacked device until *all* devices
> make use of blk_queue_split() (or otherwise handle arbitrarily large bios).
>
> I think it would be easiest to:
> - add blk_queue_split() and call it from common code before ->make_request_fn
> is called. The ensure all devices can accept arbitrarily large bios.
> - driver-by-driver remove merge_bvec_fn and make sure the the driver can cope
> with arbitrary bios themselve, calling blk_queue_split in the make_request
> function only if needed
> - finally remove the call to blk_queue_split from the common code.
>
> Does that make sense to others?
Ok, sorry for leading in the wrong direction. Because we stack
->merge_bvec_fn calls we do indeed need it until the end.
In that case I think it's better to just go back to something like the
original order and not split the patches up, everything else is just
getting too complicated unfrotunately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists