linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Add --show-total-period for perf annotate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55658462.1000605@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2015 10:46:26 +0200
From:	Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC:	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add --show-total-period for perf annotate

On 05/26/2015 07:03 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Anyway, attached patch is capable of displaying milliseconds approximation for each instruction.
>
> You realize that the events perf is not counting do not directly map to
> wall time? Even if you count cycles, the cycles are either stopping in idle
> or changing unit as the CPU's frequencies change. For other events the
> relationship is even more remote, think what happens when counting cache or
> TLB misses.
>
> Also even if it was mapping to time somehow, it's just a hit, not a
> duration, so it cannot say how long a individual instruction took.
>
> So you cannot map a sample event to time.
>
> To do what you want you would need to use something like processor
> trace, which can do exact accounting.
>
> I think the only thing that makes sense is to account it relative to
> the event counts.
>
> -Andi
>

Hello Andi.

I realize all aspects and capabilities of perf infrastructure. Even though
these numbers are not precise, I helped me a lot with debugging of a benchmark
which heavily utilizes a single CPU and runs in magnitude of seconds.

Ok, so let's convert the patch to feature that we can map an instruction
to a percentage number of events (cycles) it takes.

If I understand correctly, is it just about division of the number of events
related to an instruction and total number of events?

Thanks,
Martin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/