linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] usb: ulpi: ulpi_init should be executed in subsys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55651EDD.8030002@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2015 09:33:17 +0800
From:	"Lu, Baolu" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	balbi@...com
CC:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] usb: ulpi: ulpi_init should be executed in subsys_initcall



On 05/26/2015 10:50 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 02:24:00PM +0800, Lu, Baolu wrote:
>>
>> On 05/23/2015 12:08 AM, David Cohen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 07:29:15PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>>> Phy drivers and the ulpi interface providers depend on the
>>>> registeration of the ulpi bus.  Ulpi registers the bus in
>>>> module_init(). This could result in a load order issue, i.e.
>>> It's still not an issue :(
>>> I'd say "unnecessary probe delays".
>> I managed to boot a kernel built from the top of Felipe's
>> remotes/origin/next branch under an Ubuntu environment
>> on Intel's Bay Trail tablet.
>>
>> The same panic (as I found in the Android environment previously)
>> shows up as well. And if I replace module_init() with sys_initcall(),
>> the panic disappears.
> the problem is something else... Moving things around in the init levels
> is just a workaround for another issue. Seems like there's some missing
> EPROBE_DEFER somewhere.

Yes, I agree.

Heikki, I assume "missing EPROBE_DEFER issue" will be fixed by
Sasha's patch. I will resend the patch with a new commit
message.

Thanks,
Baolu

>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/