[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150527023702.GA7038@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:37:02 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, balbi@...com,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] usb: ulpi: ulpi_init should be executed in
subsys_initcall
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:45:37AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Phy drivers and the ulpi interface providers depend on the
> registration of the ulpi bus. Ulpi registers the bus in
> module_init(). This could cause unnecessary probe delays.
What do you mean by "probe delays"?
>
> Reported-by: Zhuo Qiuxu <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> index 0e6f968..01c0c04 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/common/ulpi.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int __init ulpi_init(void)
> {
> return bus_register(&ulpi_bus);
> }
> -module_init(ulpi_init);
> +subsys_initcall(ulpi_init);
Hasn't this already been rejected?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists