linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm64: Implement vmalloc based thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 01:05:42 +0900
From:	Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, barami97@...il.com,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] arm64: Implement vmalloc based thread_info allocator

On May 27, 2015, at 4:31 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 15:22:50 Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> On (05/27/15 13:10), Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 08:29:59PM +0900, Jungseok Lee wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
>>>>    goto nopage;
>>>> 
>>>> IMHO, a reclaim operation would be not needed in this context if memory is
>>>> allocated from vmalloc space. It means there is no need to traverse shrinker list. 
>>> 
>>> For making fork successful with using vmalloc, it's bandaid.
> 
> Right.

Thanks for a clear feedback!

It sounds like Catalin's idea should be considered seriously in ARM64 perspective.

Best Regards
Jungseok Lee--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/