[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBbLiSWmptfsWO8zmkquq7KsojThU7m7sLxhbwLX1co0YGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:37:01 -0700
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] ia64: fix up obsolete cpu function usage.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> cpumask_test_cpu() doesn't take volatile, unlike the obsoleted
> cpu_isset. The only place ia64 really cares is the spin waiting for a
> bit; udelay() is probably a barrier but insert rmb() to be sure.
Good to be sure ... but cpumask_test_cpu() simply calls test_bit() ...
and 2 out of 3 versions of that function throw "volatile" back into the
mix: :-)
Global definition: test_bit
File Line
0 include/asm/bitops.h 334 test_bit (int nr, const volatile
void *addr)
1 asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h 103 static inline int test_bit(int
nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr)
2 asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h 16 static __always_inline int
test_bit(unsigned int nr, const unsigned long *addr)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists