linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ahci: Move interrupt enablement code to separate functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150527180920.GR7099@htj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2015 14:09:20 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...ium.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ahci: Move interrupt enablement code to separate
 functions

Hello,

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:01:31AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> +static int ahci_init_intx(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int n_ports,
> +			struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
> +{
>  	pci_intx(pdev, 1);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }

Let's please not factor out the above as a separate function.  An one
lin function which always returns 0 doesn't really serve any purpose.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/