[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Dnj9zeeyUQxwR5BpWDpghvNVmgRkL4BJMC9J0KXD6SKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 17:46:35 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: remove unneeded test
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@...il.com> wrote:
> The same code is executed regardless ret value, so this test can be
> removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Navet <laurent.navet@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/gdm72xx/usb_boot.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/usb_boot.c b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/usb_boot.c
> index 3ccc447..7f80553 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/usb_boot.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/usb_boot.c
> @@ -255,8 +255,6 @@ static int em_wait_ack(struct usb_device *usbdev, int send_zlp)
>
> /*Wait for ACK*/
> ret = gdm_wibro_recv(usbdev, &ack, sizeof(ack));
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto out;
> out:
> return ret;
> }
What about removing the 'out' label like this?
--- a/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/usb_boot.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gdm72xx/usb_boot.c
@@ -250,15 +250,11 @@ static int em_wait_ack(struct usb_device *usbdev, int send
/*Send ZLP*/
ret = gdm_wibro_send(usbdev, NULL, 0);
if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
+ return ret;
}
/*Wait for ACK*/
- ret = gdm_wibro_recv(usbdev, &ack, sizeof(ack));
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
-out:
- return ret;
+ return gdm_wibro_recv(usbdev, &ack, sizeof(ack));
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists