[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55667640.6090605@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 07:28:24 +0530
From: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpuidle: Do not use CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START in
cpuidle.c
On 05/28/2015 07:39 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> The CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START symbol is defined as 1 only if
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX is set, otherwise it is defined as 0.
> However, if CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX is set, the first (index 0)
> entry in the cpuidle driver's table of states is overwritten with
> the default "poll" entry by the core. The "state" defined by the
> "poll" entry doesn't provide ->enter_dead and ->enter_freeze
> callbacks and its exit_latency is 0.
>
> For this reason, it is not necessary to use CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START
> in cpuidle_play_dead() (->enter_dead is NULL, so the "poll state"
> will be skipped by the loop).
>
> It also is arguably unuseful to return states with exit_latency
> equal to 0 from find_deepest_state(), so the function can be modified
> to start the loop from index 0 and the "poll state" will be skipped by
> it as a result of the check against latency_req.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ int cpuidle_play_dead(void)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> /* Find lowest-power state that supports long-term idle */
> - for (i = drv->state_count - 1; i >= CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i--)
> + for (i = drv->state_count - 1; i >= 0; i--)
> if (drv->states[i].enter_dead)
> return drv->states[i].enter_dead(dev, i);
>
> @@ -79,9 +79,9 @@ static int find_deepest_state(struct cpu
> bool freeze)
> {
> unsigned int latency_req = 0;
> - int i, ret = freeze ? -1 : CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START - 1;
> + int i, ret = -ENXIO;
>
> - for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
> struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
> struct cpuidle_state_usage *su = &dev->states_usage[i];
>
Reviewed-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists