[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zj4pwj3e.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:37:17 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, oleg@...hat.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
linux@...izon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] latched RB-trees and __module_address()
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:27:05PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
Hmm, this blows up:
> +static void module_assert_mutex_or_preempt(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> + if (!unlikely(debug_locks))
> + return;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!rcu_held_lock_sched_held() &&
> + !lockdep_is_held(&module_mutex));
That's rcu_read_lock_sched_held, not rcu_held_lock_sched_held().
Also, your unlikely is weird and backwards.
I changed it as below, and folded. It's in modules-next.
I'm now going to do some *actual* testing, and I'll go all Torvalds on
you if this spews warnings...
Cheers,
Rusty.
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 4a89b88b4428..a15899e00ca9 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -113,10 +113,10 @@ static void module_assert_mutex(void)
static void module_assert_mutex_or_preempt(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- if (!unlikely(debug_locks))
+ if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
return;
- WARN_ON(!rcu_held_lock_sched_held() &&
+ WARN_ON(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() &&
!lockdep_is_held(&module_mutex));
#endif
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists