[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150528180705.GQ7484@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 11:07:05 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, namhyung@...nel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] perf, tools: Add a --no-desc flag to perf list
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 02:39:14PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:23:28PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Add a --no-desc flag to perf list to not print the event descriptions
> > that were earlier added for JSON events. This may be useful to
> > get a less crowded listing.
> >
> > It's still default to print descriptions as that is the more useful
> > default for most users.
>
> I might not be typical user, but the first thing I tried to
> explore was 'perf list -v' ;-)
>
> would it be better to have just the list with event names for:
> $ perf list
>
> and with descriptions for:
> $ perf list -v
>
> not sure we already discussed this..
It was discussed last time. I think it's better to have descriptions
by default. Far more user friendly.
One thing we could in theory do with -v is to switch between Brief and Public
Description (the later is often more verbose). Would need some changes
to the alias code to have two descriptions though.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists