[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150528170542.3b3a7b48@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:05:42 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rcu: introduce list_last_or_null_rcu
On Thu, 28 May 2015 16:35:27 -0400
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org> wrote:
> Add list_last_or_null_rcu(), to simplify getting the last entry from a
> rcu-protected list. The standard list_last_entry() can't be used as it
> is not rcu-protected; the list may be modified concurrently. And the
> ->prev pointer can't be used, as only the ->next pointers are protected
> by rcu.
>
> This simply iterates forward through the entire list, to get to the last
> entry. If the list is empty, it returns NULL.
May I asked what this would be used for? It seems awfully inefficient
in its implementation. What use cases would this be for? I hate to add
something like this as a generic function which would encourage people
to use it. Iterating over an entire list to find the last element is
just nasty.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists