linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 37/45] nfs/sunrpc: No more encode and decode function pointer casting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHpGcMKn1khdNTk=MFS7vFgLCHmxX2fVTJanertXT+Zj_BnAKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 May 2015 01:40:28 +0200
From:	Andreas Grünbacher <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>
To:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 37/45] nfs/sunrpc: No more encode and decode function
 pointer casting

2015-05-29 1:11 GMT+02:00 Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>:
> How is this even remotely relevant to ACL functionality, and why does
> it deserve to bypass the NFS tree?

I've posted this to the linux-nfs mailing list for review among
others, how is that
bypassing the NFS tree? Would you prefer those things sent to you personally
as well?

This patch prepares for for the next one which changes the prototype
of the encode
functions to return an error code. Without this patch, oversights in
the next patch
would go unnoticed; with this patch, the compiler will complain.

Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/