linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 1/2] ARM: socfpga: support suspend to ram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5567D9C4.7090903@opensource.altera.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 22:15:16 -0500
From:	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
To:	Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Steffen Trumtrar" <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Delicious Quinoq <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 1/2] ARM: socfpga: support suspend to ram



On 5/28/15 4:19 PM, Alan Tull wrote:
> Add code that requests that the sdr controller go into
> self-refresh mode.  This code is run from ocram.
> 
> Suspend-to-RAM and EDAC support are mutually exclusive on
> SOCFPGA.  If the EDAC is enabled, it will prevent the
> platform from going into suspend.
> 
> Example of how to request to suspend to ram:
>  $ echo enabled > \
> /sys/devices/soc/ffc02000.serial0/tty/ttyS0/power/wakeup
> 
>  $ echo -n mem > /sys/power/state
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>
> Cc: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> v2: use Generic on-chip SRAM driver to allocate ocram
>     rm fncpy_align since generic allocator handles alignment
>     check __arm_ioremap_exec return code
>     check for NULL pointers
>     add a comment regarding sdram controller configuration
> v3: fix renamed #define
>     propagate socfpga_setup_ocram_self_refresh error code
> v4: Kconfig: don't need to select GENERIC_ALLOCATER
>     add CONFIG_SOCFPGA_SUSPEND
>     make s2r and EDAC support mutually exclusive
>     socfpga.c: add sdr_ctl_base_addr
>     return error if ocram not available in device tree
>     update copyright years
> v5: remove compile time dependency
>     edac driver will prevent suspend
>     don't configure scu standby mode; done in enable_scu().
>     fix comments about required sdram controller configuration
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Kconfig        |   10 ++-
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/Makefile       |    1 +
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/core.h         |    6 +-
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c           |  149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/self-refresh.S |  136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c      |    6 +-
>  drivers/edac/altera_edac.c           |   20 +++++
>  7 files changed, 325 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-socfpga/self-refresh.S
> 

Which branch are you basing this patch on? I got a trivial patch
conflict in Kconfig when I applied to arm-soc/for-next and v4.1-rc5.

Also, I'm getting these sparse warnings:

arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c:86:25: warning: incorrect type in argument 1
(different address spaces)
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c:86:25:    expected void *<noident>
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c:86:25:    got void [noderef]
<asn:2>*[assigned] suspend_ocram_base
arch/arm/mach-socfpga/pm.c:108:52: warning: cast removes address space
of expression

Dinh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/