linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/17] framebuffer: simple conversions to arch_phys_wc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5567FDBE.8010701@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 May 2015 08:48:46 +0300
From:	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/17] framebuffer: simple conversions to arch_phys_wc_add()



On 29/05/15 03:30, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
> 
> Tomi,
> 
> Upon integration onto your tree of the series, "[PATCH v3 00/17] framebuffer:
> simple conversions to arch_phys_wc_add()" the 0 day build bot found a
> compilation issue on the gbefb driver. I had test compiled drivers with
> allyesconfig and allmodconfig but failed to test compile against MIPS. This
> driver is enabled *only for MIPS*.  For the life me I could not get a MIPS
> cross compiler even on debian, so what I did to test this was incorporate into
> my private tree a temporary patch [0] which enables this driver to compile on
> x86 and go test compile with that as a temporary patch. The compilation was
> failing since I used the info struct instead of the actual private data
> structure. This fixes that and moves its assignment early.  Sorry about that.
> 
> The rest of the series does not require changes for integration after these
> two patch replacements. Let me know if you'd like me to respin the entire
> series though, but I didn't since I figured its pointless as the patches remain
> intact. For your convenience however I've rebased all these 17 patches onto
> your latest tree on the for-next branch, you can pull the changes with the
> details provided below. This v4 iteration only carries the two patches which
> required updates. The details of the full pull request go below this.

Thanks, I've updated the two patches, and pushed the series to my for-next.

 Tomi


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)