linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: mvebu: Fix mapping of pin 63 (gpo -> gpio)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 May 2015 11:10:02 +0200
From:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Andrew Andrianov <andrew@...mnt.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: mvebu: Fix mapping of pin 63 (gpo -> gpio)

Dear Andrew Andrianov,

On Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:29:19 +0300, Andrew Andrianov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Andrianov <andrew@...mnt.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c
> index c4f51d0..78c332d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mvebu/pinctrl-armada-370.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static struct mvebu_mpp_mode mv88f6710_mpp_modes[] = {
>  	   MPP_FUNCTION(0x5, "audio", "mclk"),
>  	   MPP_FUNCTION(0x6, "uart0", "cts")),
>  	MPP_MODE(63,
> -	   MPP_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpo", NULL),
> +	   MPP_FUNCTION(0x0, "gpio", NULL),
>  	   MPP_FUNCTION(0x1, "spi0", "sck"),
>  	   MPP_FUNCTION(0x2, "tclk", NULL)),
>  	MPP_MODE(64,

I know the patch has already been applied, but this is weird: I just
checked the datasheet again, and it really says this pin is a "gpo".
I'll try to get some more information.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/