linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150529092119.GA20737@krava.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 May 2015 11:21:19 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:43:14AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:17:26PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > Ping?
> 
> Jiri, Ack?

yep, I've already ack-ed that.. should be on the lkml somewhere ;-)

> 
> And from a quick look, isn't this better split in two pieces, i.e. the
> first wiring up ARM64 to libunwing, i.e. all those perf_regs.h files
> being added to tools/perf/arch/arm64/, and then a second patch, enabling
> the dwarf unwind 'perf test' entry to run on ARM64?

I guess.. but the change is fairly small, so it did not occur
to me as necessary..

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/