linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix -i option, which is currently ignored.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150529124353.GM24859@kernel.org>
Date:	Fri, 29 May 2015 09:43:53 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix -i option, which is currently ignored.

Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:42:41AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:06:44PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > Assign input_name, received from program arguments, to
> > file data structure.
> 
> Doesn't apply:
> 
> pat[acme@zoo linux]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch 
> patching file tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 289.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 346.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c.rej
> [acme@zoo linux]$
> 
> What branch is this intended for? I.e. where have you cloned this from?
> 
> Yeah, I reproduced the problem and will try to figure this out, but
> please always be explicit where to apply this.

I tried first on perf/core, then on perf/urgent, and it didn't apply in
both cases :-(

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/