[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150529144024.GC14918@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:40:24 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: introduce arm64 support unwind test.
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:32:55AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:21:19AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:43:14AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:17:26PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > > > Ping?
>
> > > Jiri, Ack?
>
> > yep, I've already ack-ed that.. should be on the lkml somewhere ;-)
>
> > > And from a quick look, isn't this better split in two pieces, i.e. the
> > > first wiring up ARM64 to libunwing, i.e. all those perf_regs.h files
> > > being added to tools/perf/arch/arm64/, and then a second patch, enabling
> > > the dwarf unwind 'perf test' entry to run on ARM64?
>
> > I guess.. but the change is fairly small, so it did not occur
> > to me as necessary..
>
> :-)
>
> I felt mislead when looking at the subject, i.e. "hey, a new test,
> testing unwind on arm64", no, it wasn't that, it introduces support for
> unwind on ARM64 by providing that regs mapping, then it _enables_ an
> existing test on arm64 :-\
still it's good news right? ;-)
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists