[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150529170600.GF17421@naverao1-tp.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 22:36:00 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/schedstat: Expose /proc/<pid>/schedstat if delay
accounting is enabled
On 2015/05/29 11:54AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > So all this should really be cleaned up:
> > >
> > > include/linux/sched.h:#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> > > include/linux/sched.h:#endif /* defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT) */
> > > include/linux/sched.h:#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> > > kernel/sched/core.c:#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> > > kernel/sched/stats.h:#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> > > kernel/sched/stats.h:#endif /* CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS || CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT */
> > >
> > > by introducing an intermediate Kconfig variable, named CONFIG_SCHED_INFO or so,
> > > and selected by both SCHEDSTATS and TASK_DELAY_ACCT.
> > >
> > > Please make it two patches: the first one adds CONFIG_SCHED_INFO and cleans up the
> > > code to use it, the second one uses it for the procps change.
> >
> > Sure, will do.
> >
> > On a related note, even though sum_exec_runtime is available unconditionally, I
> > dump all zeroes in my patch if !sched_info_on() to make it clear that some of
> > the fields are not available. Is this ok or should be display sum_exec_runtime
> > regardless of sched_info?
>
> So I'd suggest printing -1 for non-available fields, that should be unambigous
> enough and makes it also possible to write out 0 in some cases.
Per Documentation/scheduler/sched-stats.txt (and the linked latency.c
there), user-space seems to be expecting unsigned values here. Would
displaying -1 here be ok?
Thanks,
Naveen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists