[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iobb46t5.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 10:44:38 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ARM: bcm2835: Drop the fixed sys_pclk.
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> writes:
> On 05/18/2015 01:43 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> Nothing uses it, and I can't find any evidence that anything ever has.
>
> Does the clock actually exist though? If it does, it seems reasonable to
> keep it.
Yes, it's kept in the form of the core clock in the RPi driver, and the
clock-frequency values in spi and i2c in bcm2835.dtsi.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists