[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1432925336.8727.29.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 20:48:56 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
ktkhai@...allels.com
Subject: Re: sched_setscheduler() vs idle_balance() race
P.S. intel_idle is not all that wonderful on this box.
- 78.31% [kernel] [k] _raw_spin_lock ▒
- _raw_spin_lock ▒
- 94.91% tick_broadcast_oneshot_control ▒
intel_idle ▒
cpuidle_enter_state ▒
cpuidle_enter ▒
+ cpu_startup_entry ▒
+ 1.63% pull_rt_task ▒
+ 1.35% __sched_setscheduler ▒
+ 1.11% push_rt_task.part.46 ▒
+ 2.44% [kernel] [k] native_write_msr_safe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists