[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150529185002.GA7856@potion.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 20:50:03 +0200
From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com, bdas@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] KVM: x86: API changes for SMM support
2015-05-27 19:05+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> This patch includes changes to the external API for SMM support.
> All the changes are predicated by the availability of a new
> capability, KVM_CAP_X86_SMM, which is added at the end of the
> patch series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -309,7 +312,13 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> - __u32 reserved[10];
> + struct {
> + __u8 smm;
> + __u8 pending;
> + __u8 smm_inside_nmi;
(The 'u8 flags' discussion made me see that we just lost 21 bits here,
but it seems worth the sacrifice.)
> + __u8 pad;
> + } smi;
> + __u32 reserved[9];
> @@ -3237,6 +3250,18 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + if (events->flags & KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM) {
> + if (events->smi.smm)
> + vcpu->arch.hflags |= HF_SMM_MASK;
> + else
> + vcpu->arch.hflags &= ~HF_SMM_MASK;
> + vcpu->arch.smi_pending = events->smi.pending;
> + if (events->smi.smm_inside_nmi)
> + vcpu->arch.hflags |= ~HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK;
~~~ ~~ ~ HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK.
> + else
> + vcpu->arch.hflags &= ~HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK;
(Looks like a use case for a new helper,
__assign_bit(HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK,
&vcpu->arch.hflags,
events->smi.smm_inside_nmi);)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists