[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150529143720.f660ab8a16aefa816da04a0a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 14:37:20 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zpool: add EXPORT_SYMBOL for functions
On Fri, 29 May 2015 12:35:46 -0400 Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:36:05AM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote:
> >> because they are available for public use, per zpool.h? If, e.g.,
> >> zram ever started using zpool, it would need them exported, wouldn't
> >> it?
> >
> > If you want to use it in ram export it in the same series as those
> > changes, and explain what the exprots are for in your message body.
> >
>
> I don't want to use it in zram. I wrote zpool, but neglected to
> export the functions. They should be exported though.
>
> What's your reasoning for not wanting them exported?
It's just noise which has no value. Adding exports when there is a
demonstrated need is an OK approach.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists