[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556997D6.7020105@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 18:58:30 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@...hat.com
CC: gleb@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] KVM: x86: fully implement vMTRR
On 05/30/2015 06:59 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Currently guest MTRR is completely prohibited if cache snoop is supported on
> IOMMU (!noncoherent_dma) and host does the emulation based on the knowledge
> from host side, however, host side is not the good point to know
> what the purpose of guest is. A good example is that pass-throughed VGA
> frame buffer is not always UC as host expected
>
> Besides that, there is a bugs in current code if noncoherent_dma is detected:
> KVM still uses hugepage even if the 4K pages in that ranges span between
> on different memory types and uses the cache type of first page to do memory
> mapping
>
> This patchset enables full MTRR virtualization and currently only works on
> Intel EPT architecture
>
> There is the code will be attached in this thread is used to check the effect
> of this patchset:
> [12834.843439] __INIT__.
> [12835.909109] Running in preload MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE 4753900 ns.
> [12835.915232] Running in MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE 5257522 ns.
> [12838.083948] Running in preload MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK 13266 ns.
> [12838.084998] Running in MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK 13099 ns.
>
Has been attached in this mail.
View attachment "main.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (3623 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists