linux-kernel - Re: Device Tree Blob (DTB) licence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 May 2015 21:59:26 +0200
From:	Jeroen Hofstee <linux-arm@...pectrum.nl>
To:	Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC:	freebsd-arm@...ebsd.org,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Device Tree Blob (DTB) licence

Hi,

On 22-05-15 12:05, Yann Droneaud wrote:
> Le mardi 05 mai 2015 à 11:41 -0500, Rob Herring a écrit :
>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I believe Device Tree Blob (.dtb file) built from kernel's Device
>>> Tree
>>> Sources (.dts, which #include .dtsi, which #include .h) using
>>> Device
>>> Tree Compiler (dtc) are covered by GNU General Public Licence v2
>>> (GPLv2), but cannot find any reference.
>> By default yes, but we've been steering people to dual license them
>> GPL/BSD.
>>
>

obviously these files should be reusable. If there is a license issue
with that it should be fixed. cc-ing freebsd-arm@...ebsd.org.

I am not a lawyer,

Jeroen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/