linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: use schedule_timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150530060033.GA25881@1wt.eu>
Date:	Sat, 30 May 2015 08:00:33 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
Cc:	Willy Tarreau <willy@...a-x.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Mariusz Gorski <marius.gorski@...il.com>,
	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: use schedule_timeout_interruptible()

Hi Nicholas,

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:02:32PM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> API consolidation with coccinelle found:
> ./drivers/staging/panel/panel.c:782:2-18:
>         consolidation with schedule_timeout_*() recommended
> 
> This is a 1:1 conversion with respect to schedule_timeout() to the
> schedule_timeout_interruptible() helper only - so only an API
> consolidation to improve readability. The timeout was being passed
> as (ms * HZ + 999) / 1000 but that simply looks wrong - rather than
> "manual" converting to jiffies, msecs_to_jiffies which handles all 
> corner-cases correctly, was used.
> 
> Patch was compile tested with x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_STAGING=y,
> CONFIG_PARPORT=m, CONFIG_PANEL=m
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>

> ---
> Patch is against 4.1-rc5 (localversion-next is -next-20150529)
> 
> not really clear what the intent of (ms * HZ + 999) / 1000 was - this 
> is HZ dependent and does not really make sense - the comment states
> "sleeps that many milliseconds" so it probably simply should be
> msecs_to_jiffies(ms) - but someone that knows the intention of this code
> needs to check this.

Oh it's very simple, we call this a bug :-)
The code was written for kernel 2.2 and by then there was no
msecs_to_jiffies(). I did a mistake with this +999, the purpose was
to round up, but it's not 999 that should have been used, but HZ-1
since the result is supposed to be in units of HZ.

Thanks for fixing this one!

Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/