linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 96/98] HACK include/uapi/linux/coda

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 31 May 2015 07:19:13 -0400
From:	Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>
To:	Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 96/98] HACK include/uapi/linux/coda_psdev.h: fix
 compilation in userspace

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 05:39:28PM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> Include linux/coda.h for caddr_t and use unsigned short type directly.
> Userspace headers do not have list_head and wait_queue_head_t so just
> ifdef them away which is a HACK. Any ideas how to fix this properly?

I grepped the Coda userspace sources and it doesn't look like this
particular struct is used there anyway, it is only used by the kernel
module to track which requests are waiting to be read by the Coda
userspace application and after that which requests are waiting for a
response.

I guess a proper fix would be to move this struct to a non-uapi header,
or maybe even to the (probably) only C file in the kernel where it is
used.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/