[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150530.173900.1466293770301543958.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 17:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: kys@...rosoft.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com,
jasowang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss
queues
From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 13:16:57 -0700
> The current algorithm for deciding on the number of VRSS channels is
> not optimal since we open up the min of number of CPUs online and the
> number of VRSS channels the host is offering. So on a 32 VCPU guest
> we could potentially open 32 VRSS subchannels. Experimentation has
> shown that it is best to limit the number of VRSS channels to the number
> of CPUs within a NUMA node.
>
> Here is the new algorithm for deciding on the number of sub-channels we
> would open up:
> 1) Pick the minimum of what the host is offering and what the driver
> in the guest is specifying as the default value.
> 2) Pick the minimum of (1) and the numbers of CPUs in the NUMA
> node the primary channel is bound to.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists