linux-kernel - Re: FW: [PATCH] Staging: vt6655: Remove unnecessary equality checks in rxtx.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150531013328.GB28154@kroah.com>
Date:	Sun, 31 May 2015 10:33:28 +0900
From:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"Harisangam, Sharvari (S.)" <sharisan@...teon.com>
Cc:	"forest@...ttletooquiet.net" <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
	"tvboxspy@...il.com" <tvboxspy@...il.com>,
	"gclement@...bob.org" <gclement@...bob.org>,
	"haticeerturk27@...il.com" <haticeerturk27@...il.com>,
	"mahfouz.saif.elyazal@...il.com" <mahfouz.saif.elyazal@...il.com>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH] Staging: vt6655: Remove unnecessary equality checks
 in rxtx.c

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 03:54:27PM +0000, Harisangam, Sharvari (S.) wrote:
> Modified the if-else statements to remove unnecessary comparisons in rxtx.c.
> This change was detected with the help of coccinelle tool
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harisangam Sharvari <sharisan@...teon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c |    8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Why did you resend this with a forward?

Which one should I take?

I'm going to drop both as I don't know what to do, please resend the one
you wish to have applied.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/