linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] timekeeping: always make sure wall_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150531051007.GA3100@udknight>
Date:	Sun, 31 May 2015 13:10:07 +0800
From:	Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To:	john.stultz@...aro.org
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] timekeeping: always make sure wall_to_monotonic isn't
 positive

I meet two issues on an IMX6 development board without enable
RTC device(so timekeeping_init will initialize the boot time
and monotonic to 0).

Issue 1:exportfs -a generate:
       "exportfs: /opt/nfs/arm does not support NFS export"
Issue 2:cat /proc/stat:
       "btime 4294967236"

Exact reproduction of the same issues on x86 after run below
code:
"	int main(void)
	{
	    struct timeval val;
	    int ret;

	    val.tv_sec = 0;
	    val.tv_usec = 0;
	    ret = settimeofday(&val, NULL);
	    return 0;
	}
"
Reason:
The reason is positive wall_to_monotonic push boot time back to the time
before Epoch, getboottime will return negative value.

In issue 1:
          negative boot time cause get_expiry overflow time_t when input expire
          time is 2147483647, then cache_flush always clear entries just added
          in ip_map_parse.
In issue 2:
          show_stat use "unsigned long" to print
          negative value return by getboottime.

This patch fix these two issues.

Note: this patch will cause we can't use settimeofday with time
      earlier than current time on system which timekeeping_init
      initialize the xtime, boot and monotonic to 0 before set
      current time to a more reasonable time point.

Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
---
 Changes v1-v2:
 1: fix subject, use "isn't positive" instead of "is negative".
 2: rewrite changelog.
 3: simplify code as suggested by John Stultz.

 It really take me some times to realize how stupid and 
 buggy the version 1 patch is, but I am ready to be told
 this version is even stupider:)

 Thanks.

 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index 0d784b3..b501aa6 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -895,6 +895,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
 	struct timekeeper *tk = &tk_core.timekeeper;
 	struct timespec64 ts_delta, xt;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!timespec64_valid_strict(ts))
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -908,10 +909,15 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
 	ts_delta.tv_sec = ts->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
 	ts_delta.tv_nsec = ts->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;
 
+	if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts_delta) > 0) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, timespec64_sub(tk->wall_to_monotonic, ts_delta));
 
 	tk_set_xtime(tk, ts);
-
+out:
 	timekeeping_update(tk, TK_CLEAR_NTP | TK_MIRROR | TK_CLOCK_WAS_SET);
 
 	write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
@@ -920,7 +926,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
 	/* signal hrtimers about time change */
 	clock_was_set();
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday64);
 
@@ -949,7 +955,8 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts)
 
 	/* Make sure the proposed value is valid */
 	tmp = timespec64_add(tk_xtime(tk),  ts64);
-	if (!timespec64_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
+	if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts64) > 0 ||
+	    !timespec64_valid_strict(&tmp)) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto error;
 	}
-- 
1.8.5.6.2.g3d8a54e.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/