[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r3pwgd0b.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 15:56:44 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bertrand Jacquin <beber@...eeweb.net>, Marco d'Itri <md@...ux.it>,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jon Masters" <jcm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS: add hint that userspace support may easily be missing.
Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a not so nice experience
> when finally upgrading to a new 4.1-rc5
> with CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS newly enabled -
> userspace binary parts (kmod 18 or 20 in my case)
> did not have compression enabled
> (at least on Debian 8pre, vs. encountering it enabled on FC21)
> since it does not seem to be
> the default build configuration of kmod (yet?).
Sure. Let's get the maintainers to insert the actual version required
in the help text though.
Thanks,
Rusty.
> Doing a manual
> for gz in $(find . -name "*.gz"); do echo gunzip $gz; done
> depmod -a (somewhere temporarily in bootup scripts)
> manages to fix the grave problem
> introduced by erroneously having enabled CONFIG_MODULE_COMPRESS.
>
> Thus it seems that the Kconfig text was much more optimistic
> than a hapless user would want to encounter,
> thus I decided to have it updated.
>
>
> BTW: kmod and/or module-init-tools packages
> might want to provide a generic way to openly advertise
> certain build-configured "capabilities" in the binary -
> neither
> kmod --help
> nor
> kmod -V
> indicated whether or not they provided capabilities
> such as e.g. providing or not providing support of compression types
> and which ones.
> That would have been a very helpful way
> to reliably determine
> that support in fact is missing in the binary,
> rather than having to resort to clumsy hacks
> such as ldd or even strings.
>
>
> While this is a minor but useful addition
> rather than a severe fix,
> having a CC to stable@ added subsequently might be useful.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Mohr <andim2@...rs.sf.net>
>
> ---
> init/Kconfig | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> index dc24dec..8e451f30 100644
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1951,11 +1951,19 @@ config MODULE_COMPRESS
> This option compresses the kernel modules when 'make
> modules_install' is run.
>
> - The modules will be compressed either using gzip or xz depend on the
> - choice made in "Compression algorithm".
> -
> - module-init-tools has support for gzip format while kmod handle gzip
> - and xz compressed modules.
> + The module files will be compressed either using gzip or xz
> + depending on the choice made in "Compression algorithm".
> +
> + Obviously one will then need appropriate userspace parts
> + which are actually able to deal with compressed files, too:
> + module-init-tools has support for gzip format
> + while kmod handles gzip and xz compressed modules.
> + However, we observed that in several environments
> + module loader binaries do not have that enabled (yet?)
> + and thus bootup will fail fatally -
> + manually doing ldd on these binaries
> + to detect compression libraries
> + is a tell-tale sign of having support enabled.
>
> When a kernel module is installed from outside of the main kernel
> source and uses the Kbuild system for installing modules then that
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists