[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556C26D4.6030205@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:33:08 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
CC: gleb@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] KVM: MTRR: introduce mtrr_for_each_mem_type
On 30/05/2015 12:59, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> +struct mtrr_looker {
> + /* input fields. */
> + struct kvm_mtrr *mtrr_state;
> + u64 start;
> + u64 end;
s/looker/iter/ or s/looker/lookup/
> +static void mtrr_lookup_start(struct mtrr_looker *looker)
> +{
> + looker->mem_type = -1;
> +
> + if (!looker->mtrr_state->mtrr_enabled) {
> + looker->partial_map = true;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!mtrr_lookup_fixed_start(looker))
> + mtrr_lookup_var_start(looker);
> +}
> +
Separating mtrr_lookup_start and mtrr_lookup_init is weird.
There are common parts of mtrr_lookup_*_start and mtrr_lookup_*_next.
For example this:
> + looker->mem_type = looker->mtrr_state->fixed_ranges[index];
> + looker->start = fixed_mtrr_range_end_addr(seg, index);
> + return true;
in mtrr_lookup_fixed_start is the same as this:
>
> + end = fixed_mtrr_range_end_addr(looker->seg, looker->index);
> +
> + /* switch to next segment. */
> + if (end >= eseg->end) {
> + looker->seg++;
> + looker->index = 0;
> +
> + /* have looked up for all fixed MTRRs. */
> + if (looker->seg >= ARRAY_SIZE(fixed_seg_table))
> + return mtrr_lookup_var_start(looker);
> +
> + end = fixed_mtrr_range_end_addr(looker->seg, looker->index);
> + }
> +
> + looker->mem_type = mtrr_state->fixed_ranges[looker->index];
> + looker->start = end;
in mtrr_lookup_fixed_next. Can you try to make them more common?
Basically you should have
+#define mtrr_for_each_mem_type(_looker_, _mtrr_, _gpa_start_, _gpa_end_) \
+ for (mtrr_lookup_init(_looker_, _mtrr_, _gpa_start_, _gpa_end_); \
+ !mtrr_lookup_end(_looker_); mtrr_lookup_next(_looker_))
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists