linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Jun 2015 04:31:00 -0700
From:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with Linus'
 tree

Hi Stephen,

On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 20:48 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the target-updates tree got a conflict in
> drivers/target/target_core_configfs.c between commit d588cf8f618d
> ("target: Fix se_tpg_tfo->tf_subsys regression + remove tf_subsystem")
> from Linus' tree and commits c6eec4d58f5d ("target: remove tf_subsystem
> pointers") and 93af633991fd ("target: don't copy fabric ops") and
> f0eb815f8a53 ("target: put struct target_fabric_configfs on a diet")
> from the target-updates tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the first of the target-updates tree patches is a subset
> of the patch in Linus' tree - see the result below) and can carry the
> fix as necessary (no action is required).
> 

Fixed in this morning's push to target-pending/for-next, using v4.1-rc6
updates in target-pending/master -> mainline as the updated for-next
base.

Thank you,

--nab

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/