[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150601125432.GE624@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:54:32 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: introduce new two options for objdump.
Em Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 01:10:06PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> On 05/20/2015 03:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:02:01PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> >> On 05/19/2015 04:33 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>> Em Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:29:58AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
<SNIP>
> >>>> Perhaps it should be generalized a bit? Right now we have symfs for the
> >>>> location of the tree for binaries. What about a srcfs for a source tree?
> >>>
> >>> That is a good idea indeed.
> >>
> >> I was motivated to be able to annotate source code, realized out-of-box. More precisely, on a machine A
> >> I run perf record, I moved the report file to machine B and I use these options to annotate source code.
<SNIP>
> > I guess so, and yeah, the feature implemented in your patch has value,
> > thanks for collaborating! It is just that it may fit better as a
> > complement to the --symfs stuff, that is also for off-box analysis:
> > --symfs=<directory>::
> > Look for files with symbols relative to this directory.
> > Thanks, will wait for further discussion before applying,
> Are we going to wait any longer? It looks there's no discussion effort in this thread ;)
I was waiting for you to follow thru on David's suggestion.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists