| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150601141730.1c475095@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:17:30 +0100 From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Warner Losh <imp@...imp.com> Cc: Jeroen Hofstee <linux-arm@...pectrum.nl>, Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, freebsd-arm@...ebsd.org, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org\" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>"@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: Device Tree Blob (DTB) licence > facts in a dts file. The GPL’d files aren’t stopping anybody from creating > proprietary software. People that really care will rewrite the files > from scratch anyway. People that don’t care.. well, one need look > no further than the difficulty of getting source code to different SoC > support packages for the kernel in the Android world to see how > much some people care about GPL compliance and how much > it really stops them from doing what they want. And at how many large companies follow the GPL and do provide sources, none of whom would probably have bothered otherwise.... Mostly effective is better than not trying in the first place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists