[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <556C6B87.6080403@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 16:26:15 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
CC: gleb@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] KVM: MTRR: introduce mtrr_for_each_mem_type
On 01/06/2015 11:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> + looker->mem_type = looker->mtrr_state->fixed_ranges[index];
>> > + looker->start = fixed_mtrr_range_end_addr(seg, index);
>> > + return true;
> in mtrr_lookup_fixed_start is the same as this:
>
>> >
>> > + end = fixed_mtrr_range_end_addr(looker->seg, looker->index);
>> > +
>> > + /* switch to next segment. */
>> > + if (end >= eseg->end) {
>> > + looker->seg++;
>> > + looker->index = 0;
>> > +
>> > + /* have looked up for all fixed MTRRs. */
>> > + if (looker->seg >= ARRAY_SIZE(fixed_seg_table))
>> > + return mtrr_lookup_var_start(looker);
>> > +
>> > + end = fixed_mtrr_range_end_addr(looker->seg, looker->index);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + looker->mem_type = mtrr_state->fixed_ranges[looker->index];
>> > + looker->start = end;
> in mtrr_lookup_fixed_next. Can you try to make them more common?
>
> Basically you should have
>
> +#define mtrr_for_each_mem_type(_looker_, _mtrr_, _gpa_start_, _gpa_end_) \
> + for (mtrr_lookup_init(_looker_, _mtrr_, _gpa_start_, _gpa_end_); \
> + !mtrr_lookup_end(_looker_); mtrr_lookup_next(_looker_))
... where the above code I quoted would be part of mtrr_lookup_end.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists