[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1433183189.23540.116.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:26:29 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, arnd@...db.de,
Elliott@...com, hch@....de, hmh@....eng.br,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
jgross@...e.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>, stefan.bader@...onical.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
yigal@...xistor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86/pat: Remove pat_enabled() checks
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 11:48 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>
> Now that we emulate a PAT table when PAT is disabled, there's no need
> for those checks anymore as the PAT abstraction will handle those cases
> too.
>
> Based on a conglomerate patch from Toshi Kani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
I reviewed the 1/3-3/3 patchset in your "tip-mm-2" branch, which is
different from this submitted patchset 1/4-4/4. So, my review-by
applies to the 3 patches in the "tip-mm-2" branch.
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Thanks,
-Toshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists